Material handling, which includesthe movement, storage, and protection of products, is only as effective as the technology it relies upon. And each of the industry’s primary subsegments—including cranes, conveyors, and forklifts—has its own markets, technologies, and capabilities.
Traditionally, material-handling subsegments have been highly fragmented. This fragmentation has allowed manufacturers to specialize in their respective areas, benefiting from existing brand recognition and relatively stable competition. In recent years, these subsegments have closely mirrored economic cycles, further allowing manufacturers to benefit from comparatively steady growth.
Today, however, manufacturers are having a harder time adapting to a number of trends. Urbanization and an aging industry workforce have required manufacturers to offer progressively integrated and automated services and products. Accelerating adoption of e-commerce on a larger scale is putting additional pressure on the segment with regard to SKU granularity, delivery times, and responsiveness. Furthermore, the advent of artificial intelligence (AI) and automation has created new market subsegments for automated guided vehicles (AGVs) and automated storage-and-retrieval systems (ASRS), both of which are growing at a much faster rate than traditional subsegments and creating significant challenges for OEMs.
Industry players cannot take success in material handling for granted: the approaches, methodologies, and reliance on macrotrends that worked in the past will no longer suffice. Our research points to a need for greater market integration and investment in R&D and equipment. Four pathways can help manufacturers adopt new automation technologies: moving toward a more integrated market, diversifying through partnerships or acquisitions, innovating in-house technologies, and revamping delivery models to reflect evolving customer needs.
The material-handling market has three use cases for equipment: warehouse management, shop-floor operations, and field operations. These spaces share a few common drivers of success, such as accuracy, reliability, and cost efficiencies. In warehouse management, key success metrics include picking and sorting speed and tracking accuracy. Shop-floor operations tend to value timely delivery of products to production lines and low operating costs. Finally, the field-operations use case benefits from mechanical capabilities such as construction, mining, and ports, as well as the flexibility to handle multiple operations simultaneously.
Across these activities, five equipment categories address product-movement needs, with automation playing a particularly important role in warehouse management (Exhibit 1). For example, warehouse cranes and hoists often assist with loading and unloading material in storage bays, conveyors help quickly select the right materials based on production needs, and ASRS technologies can efficiently move storage bays to optimize pickup time.
An analysis of 25 US companies across all three activities shows relatively high TSR, with better performance on the automation-heavy side of the segment. Fittingly, ASRS has the highest TSR, primarily because it has market share in both automated and conventional segments. In other words, companies that provide ASRS equipment, which accounted for five out of the 25 in our analysis, are also typically established in traditional subsegments.
In terms of growth across regions, the Americas are forecast to have the highest market CAGR by region and type of equipment, followed by Asia–Pacific and Europe (Exhibit 2). That said, global market contraction is occurring in the crane market, likely due to reduced capital expenditures and the increased sophistication of crane technology. As a result, the crane market has become highly dependent on new developments, meaning market contractions will only be partially mitigated by the expected growth in infrastructure and warehousing in the Americas and Asia–Pacific.
The shift toward increased automation is primarily occurring in the Americas and Europe, driven by the push to increase cost efficiencies in regions with higher input costs. Meanwhile, the market in Europe shows only marginal growth, given the lower impact of e-commerce and lower investments in infrastructure. Across regions, however, growth in AGV and ASRS is outsize, with increasing market share virtually unaffected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
The need for automation—and the concurrent push to collect and store the amount of data necessary to support advanced analytics—is the result of ongoing trends in the broader material-handling market, which can require different actions by manufacturers. Specifically, each segment must contend with specific trends based on its resilience to the COVID-19 crisis, the impact of market-investment schemes, changing regulations, and increased customer demand for automation or digital solutions.
Each segment must contend with specific trends based on its resilience to the COVID-19 crisis, the impact of market-investment schemes, changing regulations, and increased customer demand for automation or digital solutions.
The following market trends provide an overview of how the segment is shifting:
Many of these trends were already affecting material handling and have only accelerated since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, heightened awareness of sustainability and climate change has resulted in changing regulations. It’s thus unsurprising that many manufacturers have heightened their focus on health and safety. In the cranes subsegment, for example, rigorous emissions norms are anticipated to create demand for “hybrid” models, emphasizing the need for retrofitted power units or new cranes altogether. Conveyors face increasingly stringent safety standards, especially for the movement of harmful products. Safety requirements are also becoming more important for trucks.
Finally, the automation-friendly subsegments face health and safety challenges of their own. AGVs must address blind-spot accidents, reduce the need for human labor in hazardous conditions, and achieve predictable movements that are less prone to accidents.
Each of the five subsegments has specific trends related to its resilience regarding the COVID-19 crisis, new regulations, and demands for automation and advanced analytics. As the market changes, the 25 companies we analyzed have experienced wide variability in performance (Exhibit 3). And while two subsegments show higher TSR than the others—ASRS and industrial trucks, forklifts, and material movement—there are variances across the data. The conveyor subsegment remains competitive, with many players earning close to the median. Other subsegments, such as cranes and hoists, show relatively even TSR spreads. Overall, some subsegments are naturally positioned to respond better to trends. Because of this, diversifying or differentiating offerings should be top of mind for material-handling companies.
Despite high levels of variation, certain success factors have come to define top performers. For starters, cost control clearly differentiates market leaders and laggards, especially during a public-health crisis that has led to increased regulations and changed the dynamics of tariffs. Costs are becoming increasingly important in segments that focus their growth strategies on emerging markets or small and medium-size enterprises, such as AGVs. All segments, however, achieve margin performance by managing operating costs, improving supply-chain performance, optimizing design, and adopting new digital platforms with advanced-analytics capabilities. Furthermore, the best-performing companies managed to flex cost much more efficiently than lower-performing companies. In fact, leaders showed a 0.2 percent cost variance per 1.0 percent increase of revenue from 2015 to 2019, while laggards showed 2.4 percent in the same period.
Those that develop fully integrated solutions via M&A tend to see higher TSR returns, though few material-handling companies have leveraged acquisitions to grow their performance (Exhibit 4). We analyzed 11 leading companies and found that they focus investments on complementary product lines—such as industrial equipment, material handling, and AI—resulting in an average TSR growth of approximately 12 percent per year. Overall, leading companies consistently pursue acquisitions, which make up about 70 percent of the analyzed investments.
For example, one German manufacturer of industrial trucks improved its TSR by 130 percentage points over the past eight years, mainly through M&A, boosting the company to top-quartile performance. Other examples include expanding digital solutions, increasing the value proposition, and expanding markets in India and the Middle East.
Material-handling leaders often secure their pole positions with strategies tailored to the maturity of their respective segments. Historically, this has meant fueling growth by providing top-tier service— particularly through new digital capabilities—and superior cost management. Today, however, process optimization, increased investment in R&D and equipment, and new disruptive business models are growing in importance. Four pathways can help manufacturers succeed in the years to come.
E-commerce growth requires a much tighter integration of providers and services than anything currently offered by a single company. Due to the fragmented offerings in each subsegment, achieving the operational excellence to respond to same-day delivery, volume uncertainty, increased individualization, and lack of logistics in urban areas would not be feasible. Instead, incumbents need to diversify and expand their offerings toward a comprehensive suite of capabilities. Acquisitions or horizontal integrations with upcoming players at the forefront of technology—which can provide different types of material movements—can achieve the necessary diversification.
In markets with strong brand recognition, such as cranes and hoists or trucks and forklifts, incumbents can leverage their existing presence as a bridge toward product acquisition. Alternatively, joint ventures or partnerships would also be beneficial in that they allow new players to enter the market and drive growth.
Either way, capturing growth in e-commerce requires a move from submarkets to an integrated market, which can be achieved at different levels of scale and scope. While this doesn’t necessarily mean that a crane provider acquires a conveyor provider, such integration can be achieved in the “connection point” between the two types of product movement. When services are adjacent, such as conveyors and forklifts, a full partnership or acquisition is a potential solution.
Inventory reduction, longer replacement cycles, and the switch to automated solutions have increased customers’ focus on costs and cash—which in turn has a ripple effect on providers of material-handling equipment.
Inventory reduction has the same effect as growth in e-commerce, driving the need for more efficient distribution channels. In addition, tighter cash control is capping growth for capital-intensive industries, such as cranes, conveyors, and ASRS. Strict cost controls to facilitate lower capital expenditures from customers and new delivery models, such as long-term pay-per-use contracts and leasing-and-rental contracts, are becoming necessary to remain competitive.
New delivery models can also help. Industries separated from material-handling markets are starting to shift to the “RaaS” (robot-as-a-service) model to drive mutual advantages for customers and capital-equipment providers, reduce initial customer expenditures, and provide regular streams of revenue to providers. Some companies are already providing rental agreements for RaaS equipment.
Rapid urbanization is resulting in changing demographics. To ensure cost competitiveness in a market with existing and forecast labor scarcity, especially in areas with aging workforces, the push toward automation is critical.
In Asia–Pacific, rising costs are fueling the automation wave. In subsegments where automation is already present, such as AGVs and ASRS, technology capabilities—such as customization, system flexibility, and integration with the Industrial Internet of Things—are facing increased competition. In subsegments with less sophisticated technology, such as forklifts and cranes, automation is increasing through substitution (for example, from forklifts to AGVs) and better integration with other material-handling equipment (for example, the integration of cranes with on-the-ground distributions or with ASRS). Here, the main differentiator between leaders and laggards is how much cash is available for investment.
The market is set for growth, but not all players will be ready to capture the benefits. Winning companies will need to create “one-stop solutions” that rely on efficient models to facilitate easier delivery to customers, including a low-cost base and the ability to dilute capital expenditures. Integrated offerings across adjacent subsegments can also provide one-stop solutions. This could mean strong joint ventures and partnerships with OEMs playing in adjacent segments or with standardized and immediate-to-implement interfaces to enable equipment communication across multiple material-handling subsegments. Either way, the goal is to ultimately provide a seamless integration of all types and modes of material handling.
Material handling has always been about keeping up with changing technology. Whichever pathway is the best fit, manufacturers will need to pursue higher levels of automation through improved cost efficiencies to release resources for investments, enhanced digital technologies, and advanced-analytics capabilities. The pieces of the puzzle may be shifting, but the goals remain the same. The only way to succeed is to quickly and accurately connect with customers where they are and to fulfill their needs as they change over time.